|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Yes, the Problem is ‘Islamic Fascism’
By William Shawcross
It took US President George W. Bush to tell the truth to
Britain about the massive plot to blow US-bound airliners out of the sky. In
his first comment on the apparently foiled attempt to explode airliners flying
from Britain to the US, Bush put it simply: “This was a stark reminder that
this nation is at war with Islamic fascists.”
He is right. But in the early news reports in Britain the
words “Islamist” or “Muslim” were hardly emphasised. Let alone “extremist” or
the dread word “fascist.” Instead the common code words on television were that
the 24 men arrested were “British-born” and “of Pakistani origin”.
No mention of their Islamist ideology. Did the BBC think
they might turn out to be from Pakistan’s embattled Christian minority? I don’t
think so.
In Europe, the truth is so terrible that we are in denial.
Perhaps it is understandable. We simply do not wish to face the fact that we
really are threatened by a vast fifth column - that there are thousands of
European-born people, in Britain, in France, in Holland, in Denmark, everywhere
- who wish to destroy us.
You see this denial in the coverage of Israel’s war against
Hezbollah.
Civilian deaths in Lebanon are utterly tragic. But if you
watched only British television, particularly the BBC, you would be
hard-pressed to understand that Israel has been forced into a war for its
survival, one in which Iran has empowered its proxy, Hezbollah, to undertake
the final solution of “the Zionist entity.”
The fact that since Israel pulled out of southern Lebanon
six years ago, Hezbollah has been allowed to hijack the whole area to create a
vast attack station whose purpose is only to destroy Israel, is taken for
granted and certainly not shown to be a cause for opprobrium.
Protesters in London have been marching through the streets
carrying banners proclaiming “We Are All Hezbollah Now”.
Do they know that every Lebanese child killed is a triumph
for Hezbollah and a tragedy for Israel, as well as for Lebanon? Do they know
that among the prisoners Hassan Nasrallah demands that Israel release is a man
arrested after rejoicing in smashing out the brains of an Israeli child?
Do they know that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the
eager seeker of nuclear weapons, considers the utter destruction of Israel an
Iranian priority? Or that Hezbollah’s Nasrallah has said that he wished all
Jews would gather in Israel so they could all be destroyed at once; and that
there is no creature more disgusting in the world than a Jew, “and note that I
said a Jew, not an Israeli”?
The awful thing is that many of those who march in support
of Hezbollah may well know such things. Those who don’t know them don’t want to
trouble themselves.
And it’s not just the extremist marchers. Reasonable, conventional
armchair critics concentrate on the mistakes of Israel rather than the evil
ideology of Hezbollah. They refuse to acknowledge that a small, decent society
is now literally under the threat of death from an illegal, fascistic military
machine built throughout the hills, valleys, towns and villages of southern
Lebanon.
There is a kind of moral madness at work here.
We refuse to admit that there is a pattern to global
terrorism. European papers are frightened to publish cartoons which some Muslim
leaders demand we censor, but are happy to portray the Israelis as latter-day
Nazis.
In a live BBC interview recently, I called Hezbollah
“Islamo-fascists”. The interviewer said nervously, “That’s a very controversial
description.” I replied that it was merely accurate. She brought the interview
to a swift close.
But how else should one describe a military machine that
marches under the banner of a demagogic leader who seeks above all to kill
Jews?
It’s not just Hezbollah, of course. The same ideology of hate
and destruction motivates al-Qaeda, perhaps the inspiration, if not the
controller, of the arrested British bombers.
In Britain, we are actually quite lucky. We have a prime
minister who, in my view, has committed many, many errors at home; but abroad
Tony Blair has a clear vision, both moral and pragmatic, of the threat that we
face.
And for this he is mocked and abused as nothing more than
Bush’s “poodle”.
In a thoughtful recent speech in Los Angeles Blair spoke of
fighting an “arc of extremism.” That extremism is Islamic extremism, whether it
is inspired by al-Qaeda or by Teheran, whether its foot soldiers are Sunni or
Shi’ite, whether they were born in Britain, or southern Lebanon, or Iran, or
Saudi Arabia, or anywhere else.
As Blair said, the battle is over the values that are to
govern the future of the world. “Are they those of tolerance, freedom, respect
for difference and diversity; or those of reaction, division, hatred?”
“This is war,” said Blair.
Alas, it is. Wherever they were born, the men who want to
blow up airliners, who want to destroy Israel and, not coincidentally, who want
to kill all hope of a decent society in Iraq - are Islamo-fascists who are
united in hatred of us.
The sooner we understand that, and that they must be defeated,
the safer everyone - Christians, Jews, Muslims, and non-believers - will be.
William Shawcross is a British author and journalist. His
latest book is Allies - Why the West Had to Remove Saddam. © Jerusalem Post,
all rights reserved, reprinted by permission.
|
|||||
|
|
|
Copyright
© AIJAC 2006 |